What happens when member of society fail to associate the ‘bad’ with the ‘good’ ? Being an idealist is about not acknowledging anything that is ‘bad’. Prohibition, naturally and usually indicates something wanted, to say it otherwise, theres no point in prohibiting something, which is anyway, not wanted.
If members of civil society fail to acknowledge the ‘bad’ as the wanted, in a state of hypocrisy and pretence, what is the ‘good’ becomes something different altogether. Sometimes ‘good’ becomes only the denial of the ‘bad’, but then what it becomes is the denial of the ‘good and bad’ as a dialectical process. Without such process, we can claim, there exist no process of progression and change of thought, of perspective, otherwise known as novelty. If novelty is essential for culture and if culture is essential for survival, to where an individual can reach his/hers height in building his/hers world, or at least for the more pleasant part of life, then there should be more room for a reality that could contain opposite perspectives, or to say it more specifically – a way to build a perspective in which opposite perspectives are potential opportunities instead of only a threat to an existing contingent yet popular, wide held perspective.
About good and evil
